AN ortholateral is a(n orthogonal) quadrilateral formed of two pairs of perpendicular lines (crosses) in either the ‘blue’, ‘red’ or ‘green’ sense of ‘chromogeometry‘ (video clip). If two such ‘blue’ crosses are thus inclined in either the ‘green’ or the ‘red’ sense their lines commute into two distinct ‘green’ (or ‘red’) crosses that meet in a ‘blue’ sense.
AN equivalent description that produces this construction is to take an initial line, reflect it in a red (or green) ‘null-line’, reflect this combination in a green (or red) alternate null line and translate at least one line parallel to itself by an arbitrary amount, which could include no translation. (The apparent dependence of the ortholateral on Euclidean (blue) geometry is somewhat an illusion therefore.)
BY the Gauss-Bodenmiller Theorem[i], the midpoints of the three ‘diagonal’ segments completing a quadrilateral are collinear, and (blue) circles whose diameters lie on these segments meet in precisely two points forming a radical-axis (blue) perpendicular to the medial line joining their centres. For an ortholateral (which is not the case with a general quadrilateral), this radical-axis aligns with is the segment joining the blue perpendiculars (or crosses). This implies the remaining joins of crosses are respectively red and green perpendicular to the medial line and, transitively, that opposite vertices in the ortholateral form a mutually orthogonal set (a triply-right triangle in the language of chromogeometry.) Together with the medial line, therefore, all three joins of vertices form a NEW ortholateral.
HOWEVER, also by Gauss-Bodenmiller[ii], the four (blue) orthocentres of the triangles associated to a general quadrilateral are collinear and lie on the (blue) radical-axis. In chromogeometry, with its three distinct perpendiculars, there are therefore three sets of collinear orthocentres forming three radical-axes ‘perpendicular’ to the medial line. The Theorem thus establishes that every quadrilateral has an associated ortholateral and, since every ortholateral forms a new ortholateral, we naturally consider the ‘anti-ortholateral’ relation (c/f the anti-orthic triangle) to a given ortholateral.
IN obtaining the ortholateral-of-ortholateral we drew lines completing the quadrilateral and formed a triply right diagonal triangle, plus the medial line. Being a general method in projective geometry, the vertices of an ortholateral must be in an harmonic ratio with the ‘diameters’ of its associated anti-ortholateral (which indicates a method for obtaining the latter’s construction).
TWO of the three sides of a diagonal triangle in a quadrilateral cut off an interval along the third side which, for an ortholateral due to the presence of perpenducality of sides, can be divided harmonically (per the construction for the circles of Apollonius) by a blue circle centred at the midpoint of a ‘red’ vertex and a ‘green’ vertex. (In other words, the interval to be divided will be the side of the diagonal triangle, with the associated circle diameter being the side of the ortholateral on which it lies.)
THE circle along a side is met by the line blue-perpendicular to it in two symmetric points. In addition, a ‘dual’ interval forms where the same lines, with their perpendicularity swapped, cross and meet the alternate side of the ortholateral and a circle with diameter on this side second meets line perpendicular to it in two new points. A third circle centred on the meet of both sides – at the acute ‘corner’ of the ortholateral – will pass through all four points and will meet the lines forming the sides of the ortholateral at another four points along its diameters.
THE ortholateral has generated a total of four chords on this circle – two as diameters and two as perpendicular chords (which commute to oblique chords) giving not one but two cyclic quadrangles (four points in general position) which each allow for four separate lines, forming an anti-orthoilateral. We thus have a new result: every ortholateral is associated with a pair of ‘dual’ figures (c/f four anti-orthic triangles of a triangle being considered as an orthocentric system ) and to each ortholateral there is a ‘dual’.
BY analogy with triangle geometry, the ortholateral may be considered a system of four ‘ortho-lines’, each side respectively perpendicular to its complement of three lines (which form ‘trilaterals‘ rather than ‘triangles‘), the medial line playing the role of the orthocentre in an orthic triangle (i.e. not the orthocentre of the triangle) that completes the ‘ortholineal’ system.
THE perspectivity of a triangle with its orthic triangle now becomes dual in the sense of Desargue’s Theorem: any three lines of the ortholateral are side-perspective to the lines of the diagonal triangle in its fourth line (representing an orthocentre). The orthic-of-orthic perspector is represented differently, by a side-perspectivity of the lines of the ortholateral representing the diagonal triangle to the diagonal triangle forming part of the ortholateral-of-ortholateral.
THIS brief description of a new geometrical construction opens up an exciting set of connections between classical (Euclidean) triangle geometry with projective geometry via the (new) development of quadratic-metrical geometry known as ‘chromogeometry’